MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2074389495 · doi:10.1117/12.2023409

Solar light trapping in slanted conical-pore photonic crystals

2013· article· en· W2074389495 on OpenAlexaff
Sergey Eyderman, Sajeev John, Alexei Deinega

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicSolar Thermal and Photovoltaic Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSiliconMaterials scienceOpticsLattice constantPhotonic crystalWavelengthRADIUSPhotocurrentOptoelectronicsPhysicsDiffraction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We show that with only one micron, equivalent bulk thickness, of crystalline silicon, sculpted into the form of a slanted conical-pore photonic crystal and placed on a silver back-reflector, it is possible to attain a maximum achievable photocurrent density (MAPD) of 35.5mA/cm2 from impinging sunlight [1]. This corresponds to absorbing roughly 85% of sunlight in the wavelength range 300-1100nm and exceeds the Lambertian limit suggested by previous “statistical ray trapping” arguments. When the silicon volume is reduced to an equivalent thickness of only 380nm, the MAPD remains as high as 32mA/cm2. This suggests the possibility of very high efficiency, ultra-thin-film silicon solar cells. Our one-micron structure consists of a photonic crystal square lattice constant of 850nm and slightly overlapping inverted cones with upper (base) radius of 500nm and 1600nm cone depth. When the solar cell is packaged with silica (each pore filled with SiO2 and modulation on the top is added), the MAPD in the wavelength range of 400-1100nm becomes 32.6mA/cm2 still higher than the Lambertian 4n2 benchmark of 31.2mA/cm2. Thinner structures are considered by keeping the lattice constant and cone radius fixed but by decreasing the cone depth. The MAPD dependence on the overall depth of nanopores indicates that using roughly half the amount of silicon leads to only about 5% drop in the MAPD. In the near infrared regime light is absorbed within slow group velocity modes, that propagate nearly parallel to the interface and exhibit localized high intensity vortex-like flow in the Poynting vector-field.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicSolar Thermal and Photovoltaic SystemsFrench-language works237,207