MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Characterization of Muscular Rest Periods (gaps) in Long-term EMG of Older Men and Women

2007· article· en· W2074412174 on OpenAlexaff
D.L. Edwards, Jennifer M. Jakobi

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMuscle activation and electromyography studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIsometric exerciseBicepsMedicineElectromyographyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationPhysical therapyDuration (music)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ability to maintain functional independence in older adults is largely associated with the generation and control of purposeful movement. Laboratory studies indicate that with increasing age there is a decline in muscle strength and a decrease in force control. Limited studies are available on neuromuscular activity outside the laboratory in older adults, but initial data indicate that burst activity is greater in older adults compared with young adults and in women compared with men (Appl Physiol Nut Met 31 (S22), 2006). This difference in burst activity might be due to periods of silence in electromyography (EMG) activity. PURPOSE: To characterize periods of muscle silence (gaps) in young and old men and women for an 8-hour typical weekday. METHODS: EMG was recorded in the biceps brachii, triceps brachii, quadriceps femoris and hamstrings in 16 young (23 + 2.5 yrs; 8 men, 8 women) and 15 older (77 + 3.5 yrs; 8 men, 7 women) adults. A portable EMG device was utilized. Signals were pre-amplified (1000x), band pass filtered (20–450Hz), stored on a 512 MB flashcard and subsequently downloaded to Spike 2 for custom analysis. A gap was denned as an EMG interval <1% of the maximum isometric effort (MVE), and a duration of >0.1s. Total number of gaps, gap duration (sec), gap amplitude (% MVE), mean gap activity (% MVE) and gap rate (gaps/s) were assessed. RESULTS: The number of gaps recorded did not differ as a function of age (10%δ) or gender (14%δ). However, the mean duration (sec) of the gaps were ∼2 times longer in the young compared with old, and during periods of silence the amplitude and area of the gaps were also less (3-10%δ) in the young compared with the old. Gender differences were evident as mean duration of the gaps (sec) and area of the gaps (MVC*s) were longer (∼1.5 times) in men compared with women, yet gap amplitude (%MVC) was greater in women (∼0.8 times) compared with men. CONCLUSIONS: Shorter durations and higher amplitudes of gap activity during periods of EMG silence suggest that muscles of older adults are not as quiescent as muscles of young adults during periods of “rest”. As well, total gaps do not differ between genders but the duration and amplitudes which characterize a gap differ between men and women.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise→Same topicMuscle activation and electromyography studies→French-language works237,207→