The Canadian Synchrotron Radiation Facility (CSRF) in Madison — Twenty-five years of soft X-ray research
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le premier faisceau lumineux de l'Institut canadien du rayonnement synchrotron (ICRS) a ete etabli en 1982, avec le support financier du CRSNG, en marge du synchrotron Tantalus a l'exterieur de Madison, Wisconsin, apres plusieurs annees de travaux a l'Universite de Western Ontario dans le but de creer un synchrotron au Canada. Sur une periode de vingt ans, l'ICRS a ete l'objet d'expansions qui ont porte a trois le nombre des faisceaux tres productifs de rayons X doux. La planification, le financement et la construction des trois faisceaux sont decrite dans ce travail et on decrit le travail devoue des scientifiques qui ont mis le laboratoire sur pieds ainsi que celui des personnes qui y ont realise d'importants travaux de recherches. L'ICRS a produit plus de 500 publications dans divers domaines scientifiques; ils provenaient de chercheurs attaches a onze universites canadiennes differentes. L'un des faisceaux de l'ICRS et plusieurs membres du personnel de l'ICRS ont ete transferes au Centre canadien de rayonnement synchrotron [Canadian Light Source (CLS)] a Saskatoon et l'ICRS sera formellement ferme en mars 2008.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.040 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".