“Icebergs” or No “Icebergs” in Aqueous Alcohols?: Composition-Dependent Mixing Schemes
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The classical concept of “iceberg formation” is modified by our recent thermodynamic studies. The local enhancement of the hydrogen-bond network of H 2 O in the immediate vicinity of small nonelectrolyte solutes (i.e., the “iceberg formation”) is still correct. However, the hydrogen-bond probability of bulk H 2 O away from solutes is reduced progressively, as the solute composition increases. When the hydrogen-bond probability of bulk H 2 O is reduced to the bond percolation threshold of the hexagonal ice connectivity, the hydrogen-bond percolation is lost and a qualitatively different mixing scheme sets in, whereby the solution consists of two kinds of clusters. In the solute-rich region, solute molecules form clusters of its own kind. Thus, the “iceberg formation” is basically correct within a narrow range in the H 2 O-rich region for small nonelectrolyte solutes. Thus, reference made to the “iceberg” concept in recent literatures should be clarified in terms of the concentration range and the size of solute in question.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it