Effects of anti‐oestrogens and β‐estradiol on calcium uptake by cardiac sarcoplasmic reticulum
Bibliographic record
Abstract
1. Tamoxifen and a group of structurally similar non-steroidal, triphenolic compounds inhibit the oestrogen receptor. In addition to this action, these anti-oestrogens are known to inhibit some types of plasma membrane ion channels and other proteins through mechanisms that do not appear to involve their interactions with the estrogen receptor but could be the result of their effect on membrane lipid structure or fluidity. 2. We studied the effects of beta-estradiol and three anti-oestrogens (tamoxifen, 4-hydroxytamoxifen and clomiphene) on Ca(2+) uptake into sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) vesicles isolated from canine cardiac ventricular tissue. 3. The antiestrogens all inhibit SR Ca(2+) uptake in a concentration-dependent manner (order of potency: tamoxifen > 4-hydroxytamoxifen > or = clomiphene). Although these compounds rapidly inhibit net Ca(2+) uptake they do not have a similar rapid effect on the ATPase activity of the SR Ca pump. beta-estradiol has no effect on Ca(2+) uptake nor does it alter the inhibitory action of tamoxifen on the SR. 4. The differences in the effects of beta-estradiol and the anti-oestrogens on cardiac SR Ca(2+) uptake do not correlate with differences in the ways in which these compounds have been reported to interact with membrane lipids. Our results are consistent, however, with direct effects on a membrane protein (possibly an SR Cl(-) or K(+) channel).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".