Feasibility and effectiveness of combination antiretroviral therapy in HIV‐infected infants in Pietermaritzburg, South Africa
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background : In the absence of treatment, 50% of HIV-infected children will die before 2 years of age. In a recent randomized controlled trial, a 76% decrease in mortality was observed in infants receiving early combination antiretroviral therapy [1]. The World Health Organization now recommends starting all HIV-infected infants on combination antiretroviral therapy on diagnosis [2]. However, few data are available outside a well-controlled research setting.\nPurpose of the study : To show the feasibility and effectiveness of treating HIV-infected infants in a state-funded clinic located in a poorly resourced South African township.\nMethods : A retrospective chart review was performed of all HIV-1 infected infants initiated on combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) between 1st May 2005 and 31st May 2008 at the Edendale Family Clinic, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa. All HIV-1 infected infants who were less than 1 year of age when antiretroviral therapy was initiated, and who had completed at least 6 months of treatment, were included. Weight for age Z scores, CD4 %, viral loads (VL) and haemoglobin were collected on initiation of treatment and at 6-monthly intervals thereafter. Virological success was defined as VL<25 copies/ml, immune recovery as CD4>25%. Z scores were analyzed using Epi-Info.\nSummary of results : Of 129 treated infants, 94 completed 6 months of cART; 60 completed 12 months and 39 completed 18 months of treatment. Mean age at initiation was 8 months (range 2.1-11.7). 77.2% had advanced disease (WHO Stage 3 or 4). The infants were severely malnourished, with a mean Z-score of -2.4 (range -6.1 - +0.8). Mean baseline VL was 4700 000 copies/ml. After 6 months of treatment, 52.3% of babies had an undetectable VL, with 75% having a VL of < 400 copies/ml. Viral suppression was achieved in 34 (56.9%) out of the 60 infants who completed 1 year of cART and 79.3% had a VL <400 copies/ml. Undetectable VL was found in 78.8% of the 39 children who received 18 months of treatment. Weight for age Z score increased from a mean of -2.4 (<3rd centile) at initiation of treatment to -0.3 (38th centile) for the children who received 18 months of cART. The CD4% increased from a mean of 16.5% at the start to 31.9% at 18 months.\nConclusions : This study from a township in Kwazulu-Natal shows a good clinical, immunological and virological response to cART in HIV-infected infants, despite high baseline viral loads and advanced disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".