MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2074616373 · doi:10.1109/isbi.2014.6868096

Semi-automatic segmentation of preterm neonate ventricle system from 3D ultrasound images

2014· article· en· W2074616373 on OpenAlexaff
Wu Qiu, Jing Yuan, Jessica Kishimoto, Sandrine de Ribaupierre, Eranga Ukwatta, Aaron Fenster

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInitializationSegmentationVentricleArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceLateral ventriclesImage segmentationCerebral ventricleUltrasoundComputer visionPattern recognition (psychology)MedicineRadiologyCardiologyInternal medicineAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

3D Ultrasound (US) has been developed recently to image the intracranial ventricular system of pre-term neonates in order to monitor these patients for intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) and the resultant dilatation of the ventricles. 3D US is capable of providing volumetric ventricle measurements, compared to clinically used 2D US, relying on linear measurements from a single slice, and visual and quantitative estimates to determine the severity of ventricular dilatation. In this work, we propose a convex optimization-based segmentation approach for 3D US images of the cerebral ventricles in preterm neonates with IVH. The proposed semi-automatic segmentation method makes use of the latest development in convex optimization techniques supervised by user interactive information. Experiments using 25 3D US images of 5 patients (5 time points for each subject) show that our proposed approach yielded a mean DSC of 78.9% compared to a manually contoured surface. This GPU-implemented semi-automated approach reduced the time required per segmentation by 1200% (mean times: 2.5 vs. 30 minutes). In addition, the intra-observer variability experiments showed that the variability introduced by the user initialization is small in terms of DSC, demonstrating a low intra-user variability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.522
Threshold uncertainty score0.416

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFetal and Pediatric Neurological DisordersFrench-language works237,207