Effect of the tetrapeptide RGDS on somatic embryogenesis in <i>Daucus carota</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present work examines the requirement for RGD-binding sites, such as those in the plasma membrane protein integrin during somatic embryogenesis in carrot (Daucus carota L. cv. Scarlet nantes). It is possible to assay for this requirement by competitively inhibiting binding of the site to the natural RGD-containing ligand by adding an excess of synthetic RGDS. We found that treatment of carrot callus cultures with RGDS (2.7 mM) inhibited the development of a normal shoot pole in carrot somatic embryos. The structures that formed contained separate zones of highly cytoplasmic and vacuolate cells and no evidence of embryonic organization, although occasionally a root-like structure was observed. If the aspartic acid residue in the peptide was replaced by a chemically similar amino acid (glutamic acid), the resultant somatic embryos were indistinguishable from those developing in untreated cultures. These effects are similar to those reported in animal systems where the protein receptor involved has been identified as integrin. Our results are thus consistent with the conclusion that a binding site for a motif similar to the integrin-binding site in a variety of animal extracellular matrix proteins exists in plants and appears to be important in somatic embryo development in carrot.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".