MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2074774174 · doi:10.1159/000235934

Genetic Mapping of the Ornithine Decarboxylase <i>(odc)</i> Gene Complex in Rainbow Trout <i>(Oncorhynchus mykiss)</i>

2009· article· en· W2074774174 on OpenAlexaff
Sarah M. Tuziak, Hooman K. Moghadam, Roy G. Danzmann

Bibliographic record

VenueCytogenetic and Genome Research · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPolyamine Metabolism and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyRainbow troutSyntenyQuantitative trait locusGeneticsOrnithine decarboxylase antizymeOrnithine decarboxylaseGeneLocus (genetics)Gene mappingGenetic linkageGenomeBiochemistryFisheryFish <Actinopterygii>ChromosomeEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ornithine decarboxylase (odc) and its associated gene complex, including antizymes of ODC and inhibitors of the antizymes, play a key role in regulating the overall polyamine levels (i.e., putrescine) in cells. Polyamine production levels are intricately coupled to mitotic and cellular turnover rates. Hence, these genes may be important candidates of growth regulation in vertebrates, if their chromosomal locations coincide with known quantitative trait locus (QTL) regions influencing growth traits. Here we report the genetic mapping of multiple duplicated forms of genes within this complex to previously known life-history and growth QTL regions in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Specifically, duplicated copies of the 2 antizyme genes map to Om-8/9/24, while antizyme inhibitor and odc duplicates map to Om-27/31 and Om-14/25, respectively. All sets of paralogous mapping locations correspond to ancestrally duplicated synteny regions within the genome of rainbow trout (i.e., ancestral A, B, GH/I and M linkage groups).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.755
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCytogenetic and Genome ResearchSame topicPolyamine Metabolism and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207