Growth Hormone Treatment Improves Peripheral Muscle Oxygen Extraction-Utilization during Exercise in Patients with Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Associated Wasting: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The arteriovenous oxygen difference (a-vO(2) difference), a measure of peripheral muscle oxygen extraction-utilization during exercise, is reduced in antiretroviral-treated patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), thus causing a shift in the cardiac output-oxygen consumption (Q-VO(2)) relationship. We investigated the impact of recombinant human GH (rhGH) treatment on a-vO(2) difference and the Q-VO(2) relationship during submaximal exercise by randomizing 12 HIV-infected patients (mean +/- sem: age, 43.3 +/- 1.5 yr; body mass, 69.5 +/- 2.9 kg; body mass index, 22.4 +/- 0.9 kg/m(2); maximum oxygen consumption, 33.6 +/- 1.5 ml/kg x min), with documented unintentional weight loss (>or=10% within the preceding 12 months) despite antiretroviral therapy, to receive 3 months of rhGH (6 mg/d) in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial. We assessed Q (determined noninvasively using CO(2) rebreathing), and subsequently a-vO(2) difference, from Q-VO(2) relationships. At study entry, the mean slope (8.1 +/- 1.0 liters/min x 1-liter increase in VO(2)) and intercept (3.1 +/- 1.3 liters/min), generated from each patient's Q-VO(2) relationship, were greater and lower, respectively, than those reported for healthy individuals (6.0 and 4.0, respectively), thereby indicating a deficit in the a-vO(2) difference. After 3 months of rhGH treatment, the slope decreased to 7.0, and the intercept increased to 3.5. After 1 month of rhGH treatment, the a-vO(2) difference (at a VO(2) of 1250 ml/min) significantly (P < 0.05) increased (17.1 +/- 8.9%) from baseline (9.92 +/- 0.51 ml/dl) and remained elevated (10.39 +/- 0.48 ml/dl) after 3 months of treatment. No significant changes were seen with placebo. Therefore, treatment with rhGH leads to an improvement in peripheral muscle oxygen extraction-utilization and the Q-VO(2) relationship during exercise in patients with HIV-associated wasting despite antiretroviral therapy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".