Computational Insights into the Acceptor Chemistry of Phosphenium Cations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Phosphines are traditionally considered as Lewis bases or ligands in transition metal and main group complexes. Despite their electron-rich (lone pair-bearing) nature, an extensive coordination chemistry for Lewis acidic phosphorus centers is being developed; such chemistry provides a new synthetic approach for phosphorus-element bond formation, leading to new types of structures and modes of bonding. Complexes of Ph2P+ with a variety of donor elements (P, N, C) give experimentally short donor-acceptor bond lengths, when compared to other cationic phosphorus Lewis acid complexes. We have calculated that the energy of the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) in Ph2P+ is lower than that of (Me2N)2P+, which partially explains the greater exothermicity of reactions of donors with the diaryl acceptor. Furthermore, the energies required to distort the diphenylphosphenium cation from its ground-state geometry are significantly smaller than those of the diamido cations and, thus, enhance the exothermicity of donor coordination. These computational data, in conjunction with evidence from experimental solid-state structures, indicate that Ph2P+ is a significantly better Lewis acid relative to the more common diaminophosphenium analogues (R2N)2P+ and are used to elucidate the nature of the bonding in donor-phosphenium complexes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".