The Use of Fibrin Glue in the Correction of Pollybeak Deformity
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Supratip fullness, also known as pollybeak deformity, is one of the most common postoperative complications of rhinoplasty. The deformity can result from many different causes, some of which are related to the surgical technique and can be prevented. Poor redraping of thick, inelastic skin and thick subcutaneous tissues over the reduced cartilaginous framework may result in the creation of a subcutaneous "dead space," leading to the formation of excessive subcutaneous scar and a soft tissue pollybeak in some cases. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of a homologous fibrin glue (Tisseel; Baxter AG, Vienna, Austria) in the prevention and correction of the soft tissue pollybeak deformity. DESIGN: Prospective study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty patients were treated with fibrin glue to achieve better adherence of the skin to the underlying skeletal framework. Ten patients had no previous nasal surgery. The remaining 20 patients presented with the complication of pollybeak deformity. In this group, 14 patients had undergone 1 previous surgical procedure, 3 had undergone 3 previous rhinoplasties, and 3 had undergone 4 or more previous procedures. RESULTS: There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications. Follow-up ranged from 2 to 34 months, with all patients achieving successful aesthetic outcomes. CONCLUSION: Fibrin glue is an excellent adjunct to rhinoplasty procedures because it successfully eliminates the dead space that can cause soft tissue pollybeak deformity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it