Potent side‐chain to side‐chain cyclized dermorphin analogues containing a carbonyl bridge
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A new family of cyclic opioid peptide analogues related to the 1-4 sequence of dermorphin/deltorphin (Tyr-D-Aaa2-Phe-Aaa4-NH2) has been synthesized. The synthesis of the linear precursor peptides was accomplished by the solid-phase method and ring formation was achieved via a ureido group incorporating the side chain amino functions of D-Aaa2 (D-Lys, D-Orn) and Aaa4 (Lys, Orn, Dab, Dap). The peptides were tested in the guinea-pig ileum (GPI) and mouse vas deferens (MVD) assays. Most showed very high agonist potency in the GPI assay. The peptide containing D-Lys in position 2 and Dab in position 4 was 210 times more active than enkephalin, and that containing Orn and Dab, respectively, was 150 times more active than enkephalin. The latter peptide was also very active in the MVD assay, and showed an IC50 MVD/GPI ratio of 0.816. NMR spectra of selected peptides were recorded, and structural parameters were determined. The conformational space of the peptides was examined using the electrostatically driven Monte Carlo method. With the help of the NMR spectra each peptide was described as an ensemble of conformations. The conformations have been interpreted with regard to the opioid activities, and comparisons have been made with a model proposed earlier for enkephalin analogues.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".