Influence of the efficacy of interfacial modification on the coarsening of cocontinuous PS/HDPE blends during quiescent annealing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This article studies the quiescent annealing of three different cocontinuous polystyrene/high‐density polyethylene blends modified with two types of interfacial agents of widely different efficacies. Quantitative analysis of phase growth was obtained using mercury porosimetry. In a previous work, it was shown that one of these modifiers, a symmetrical diblock copolymer, has a high affinity for the interface and demonstrates virtually no micelle formation prior to saturation of the blend interface. The other modifier, a hydrogenated SEBS of 70/30 composition, forms micelles at elevated concentrations of modifier. In this study, it is shown that the cocontinuous phase size grows linearly without modifier, whereas the addition of both interfacial modifiers significantly suppresses the PE/PS phase coarsening and results in nonlinear phase growth behavior. The effect of the diblock copolymer on suppressing coarsening, however, is much more effective than that for the triblock case clearly supporting the tendency toward micelle formation for that latter modifier. In the case of unmodified PE/PS, the driving force for capillary pressure effects is so high that it is the capillary instability phenomena that dominate the coarsening and hence result in a linear growth of pore size with annealing time. When interfacial modifiers are added, the influence of reduced interfacial tension and lower pore size polydispersity significantly diminishes both capillary pressure effects and capillary instability phenomena. In that case, capillary pressure becomes the main rate determining step resulting in a nonlinear dependence of pore size with annealing time. It is shown that both the viscosity of the phases and the temperature of annealing can strongly influence coarsening behavior at low levels of interfacial modifier. Under all those conditions, however, nonlinear phase growth for the partially compatibilized system was maintained. These results clearly show that careful quantitative coarsening experiments using mercury porosimetry can be used as a tool to analyze the efficacy of interfacial modifiers for highly continuous or cocontinuous systems. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 44: 711–721, 2006
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".