MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2075015804 · doi:10.2320/matertrans.46.2406

Reactivity between Sn–Ag Solder and Au/Ni–Co Plating to Form Intermetallic Phases

2005· article· en· W2075015804 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMATERIALS TRANSACTIONS · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectronic Packaging and Soldering Technologies
Canadian institutionsNexen (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntermetallicSolderingMaterials scienceMetallurgyReactivity (psychology)Plating (geology)Layer (electronics)Chemical engineeringComposite materialAlloy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For the formation of micro joint not to melt by secondary reflow soldering, we tried to enhance the reactivity of Sn–Ag solder with Au/Ni–20Co plating. It was confirmed that the addition of Co in Ni and existence of Au plating effectively accelerated the reaction and the Sn–Ag solder completely transformed to the intermetallic compounds with a higher melting temperature.Particularly, the addition of Co in Ni changed the interfacial reaction layer from Ni3Sn4 to (Ni,Co)Sn2 with higher diffusivity of Ni which enhanced the formation of the intermetallic phases. This process is expected to replace the packaging technology using high temperature solders.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.139
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it