MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Effects of Presurgical Local Infiltration of Bupivacaine in the Surgical Field on Postsurgical Wound Pain in Laparoscopic Gynecologic Examinations: A Possible Preemptive Analgesic Effect

2000· article· en· W2075045253 on OpenAlexaff
Jitsu Kato, Setsuro Ogawa, Joel Katz, Hitoshi Nagai, Miho Kashiwazaki, Shigeru Saeki, Hajime Suzuki

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Journal of Pain · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAnesthesia and Pain Management
Canadian institutionsToronto General HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBupivacaineAnalgesicAnesthesiaVisual analogue scaleSalineSurgeryLaparoscopic surgerySurgical woundLaparoscopy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: A randomized, double-blind, controlled study was designed to evaluate the effect of presurgical local infiltration of bupivacaine in the surgical field on postsurgical wound pain relief and analgesic requirements in 28 healthy patients scheduled for laparoscopic gynecologic examinations. INTERVENTIONS: After induction of general anesthesia by routine methods, the patients were randomly divided into two groups. In the bupivacaine (B) group (n = 15), patients were injected with 5 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine at each incisional area (four sites, total of 20 ml) approximately 15 minutes before skin incision. In the control (C) group (n = 13), the surgical field was injected with an equal volume of physiologic saline solution (four sites, total of 20 ml). OUTCOME MEASURES: Postsurgical wound pain at rest was evaluated by a 10-cm visual analog pain scale at 1, 10, 24, and 72 hours and 1 month after surgery. The patients were interviewed via telephone 1 month after hospital discharge for re-evaluation of resting pain. RESULTS: The results indicated that the incidence of postsurgical wound pain for up to 10 hours after surgery in group B was significantly lower (p < 0.05) than in group C. Pain intensity ranged from mild to moderate (2-5 cm). In addition, the mean visual analog pain scale pain intensity was significantly less for group B (0.31 +/- 0.85 cm) than for group C (2.62 +/- 2.06 cm) for up to 10 hours after surgery (p < 0.05). The number of patients who requested analgesics and complained of sleep disturbances was significantly higher in group C (p < 0.05). The mean cumulative dose of diclofenac sodium at 24 hours was significantly (p < 0.05) lower in group B (6.67 +/- 17.6 mg) than in group C (30.8 +/- 25.3 mg). Prolonged postsurgical wound pain persisting 1 month after surgery was observed in one patient in group C. CONCLUSIONS: It is concluded that presurgical infiltration of 0.25% bupivacaine in the surgical field is a useful method for decreasing postsurgical wound pain for up to 10 hours and analgesic consumption for up to 24 hours after laparoscopic gynecologic examination.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.020
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.167
Threshold uncertainty score0.710

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0200.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations98
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Journal of PainSame topicAnesthesia and Pain ManagementFrench-language works237,207