MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2075092043 · doi:10.1099/vir.0.80466-0

Role of the protein kinase PKR in the inhibition of varicella-zoster virus replication by beta interferon and gamma interferon

2004· article· en· W2075092043 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Nathalie Desloges, Markus Rahaus, M. H. Wolff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of General Virology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA regulation and disease
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAlfried Krupp von Bohlen und Halbach-StiftungFonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies
KeywordsProtein kinase RVirologyBiologyInterferonViral replicationVaricella zoster virusVirusHerpes simplex virusProtein kinase AEIF-2 kinasePhosphorylationAntiviral proteinIn vitroRNACell biologyMitogen-activated protein kinase kinaseCyclin-dependent kinase 2Gene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Varicella-zoster virus (VZV) is sensitive to type I and type II interferons (IFNs), which mediate antiviral effects. In this study, it was demonstrated that IFN-beta and IFN-gamma inhibited the replication of VZV in vitro. Although IFN-beta was more effective than IFN-gamma, the level of inhibition of VZV replication achieved by the combination of both IFNs was more than additive and it was concluded that these two cytokines acted synergistically. Expression of the IFN-induced, double-stranded RNA-activated protein kinase PKR and its phosphorylation level were not modulated strongly during ongoing replication of VZV. However, in the presence of IFN-beta, but not IFN-gamma, PKR expression and its phosphorylation were increased, explaining in part the inhibition of virus replication by IFNs. The expression of herpes simplex virus Us11, a viral protein with several functions, including prevention of PKR activation, strongly increased the level of VZV replication.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.187

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of General VirologySame topicRNA regulation and diseaseFrench-language works237,207