The analysis of clinico-pathologic characteristics in patients who underwent surgery due to stricturing and non-perineal fistulizing forms of Crohn's disease: A retrospective cohort study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of Crohn's disease is based mainly on the patient's history and clinical examination and supported by serologic, radiologic, endoscopic, and histologic findings. AIMS: The main purpose of the present study was to evaluate in a retrospective manner the clinico-pathological characteristics of patients who underwent surgery due to stricturing or non perineal fistulizing Crohn's disease. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between January 2007 and June 2012, 75 patients who were operated on for stricturing and non-perineal fistulizing forms of Crohn's disease were analyzed according to their clinico-pathological characteristics. RESULTS: The L3 localization (Montreal Classification) was detected significantly more often in the non-perineal fistulizing group than in the stricturing group (P < 0.03). Wound infection (18 patient, 24%) was the most commonly observed postoperative complication, followed by postoperative ileus (5 patients, 6.7%) and intraabdominal abscess (4 patients, 5.2%). The distribution of postoperative complications according to the two groups was not significantly different (P = 0.772). Submucosal fibrosis, ulcers and transmural inflammation were the three most common histopathological signs in resected specimens from both groups. Pseudopolyps, microabscess, granuloma, mononuclear inflammation and deep fissures were significantly far more frequent in the non perineal fistulizing group when compared to the stricturing group (P < 0.05). On the other hand, superficial ulcers were significantly more frequent in the stricturing group (P = 0.007). CONCLUSION: No specific clinical feature was found to differentiate patients with the stricturing form of Crohn's disease from the fistulizing form. However, histopathological analysis of the resected specimens revealed significant differences in some parameters between the two disease forms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".