MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2075104992 · doi:10.4141/a00-101

Effects of feeding different levels of conjugated linoleic acid and total oil to pigs on live animal performance and carcass composition

2001· article· en· W2075104992 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
M. E. R. Dugan, J. L. Aalhus, K. A. Lien, A. L. Schaefer, J. K. G. Kramer

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Animal Science · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Nutrition and Physiology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConjugated linoleic acidCanolaAnimal scienceFactorial experimentFeed conversion ratioComposition (language)Linoleic acidBiologyChemistryAnimal feedFood scienceBody weightFatty acidEndocrinologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effects of feeding different dietary levels of conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) and total oil (TO) were evaluated using 216 barrows fed from 36 to 115 kg body weight. A 3 × 2 factorial design was used with three levels of dietary CLA (0, 0.25, and 0.5%), two levels of dietary TO (2 and 5% made up with canola oil) and 12 pens of three barrows fed per diet. Pigs on all diets gained weight at the same rate from 0 to 4 wk (36 to 61 kg) and from 4 wk to slaughter (61 kg to 115 kg) (P > 0.05). Pigs fed 5% versus 2% TO had 6.6% lower feed intake from 0 to 4 wk (P = 0.02) and 5.9% lower feed intake from 4 wk to slaughter (P < 0.003), while feeding CLA had no effect on feed intake (P = 0.70). A CLA by TO interaction for feed intake was not found for 0 to 4 wk but from 4 wk to slaughter a tendency for an interaction (P = 0.06) was found indicating 0.25% CLA may depress feed intake at 2% TO while stimulating intake at 5% TO. Increasing TO and CLA increased the lean content in commercial cuts by 1.6% (P = 0.06) and 2.7% (P = 0.008), respectively. A CLA by TO interaction (P = 0.012), however, indicated CLA was less effective at increasing lean when added to 5% TO diets than to 2% TO diets, with pigs fed the 0% CLA/2% TO diet yielding 5% less lean than pigs fed any of the other diets (P < 0.05). Interestingly, a main effect for TO was not found for subcutaneous fat (SCF), but adding CLA reduced SCF (6.6%; P = 0.002). Again, a CLA by TO interaction (P = 0.008) indicated adding CLA was less effective at reducing SCF in 5% TO than 2% TO diets, with pigs fed the 0% CLA/2% TO diet having 9.7% more SCF than pigs fed any of the other diets (P < 0.05). The difference in effectiveness of CLA at different TO levels might be due to dilution of CLA by canola oil fatty acids and/or canola oil having fat to lean repartitioning effects of its own. A comparison of fats and oils with differing chain lengths and degrees of saturation would, therefore, be of interest to further define their potential differential effects on growth and metabolism. Key words: Pig, pork, swine, conjugated linoleic acid, CLA, canola oil

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.916
Threshold uncertainty score0.176

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Animal ScienceSame topicAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyFrench-language works237,207