MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Removal of the PsaF Polypeptide Biases Electron Transfer in Favor of the PsaB Branch of Cofactors in Triton X‐100 Photosystem I Complexes from <i>Synechococcus</i> sp. PCC 7002<sup>†</sup>

2008· article· en· W2075153533 on OpenAlexaff
Rufat Agalarov, Martin Byrdin, Fabrice Rappaport, Gaozhong Shen, Donald A. Bryant, Art van der Est, John H. Golbeck

Bibliographic record

VenuePhotochemistry and Photobiology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPhotosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsBrock University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotosystem IElectron transferChemistryCofactorPhotosystem IIPhotochemistryPhotosynthesisBiochemistryEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Continuous wave (CW) and transient electron paramagnetic resonance studies have implied that when PsaF is removed genetically, the double reduction of A1A is facile, the lifetime of A1A(-) is shorter and the ratio of fast to slow kinetic phases increases in PS I complexes isolated with Triton X-100 (Van der Est, A., A. I. Valieva, Y. E. Kandrashkin, G. Shen, D. A. Bryant and J. H. Golbeck [2004] Biochemistry43, 1264-1275). Changes in the lifetimes of A1A(-) and A1B(-) are characteristic of mutants involving the quinone binding sites, but changes in the relative amplitudes of A1A(-) and A1B(-) are characteristic of mutants involving the primary electron acceptors, A0A and A0B. Here, we measured the fast and slow phases of electron transfer from A1B(-) and A1A(-) to FX in psaF and psaE psaF null mutants using time-resolved CW and pump-probe optical absorption spectroscopy. The lifetime of the fast kinetic phase was found to be unaltered, but the lifetime of the slow kinetic phase was shorter in the psaF null mutant and even more so in the psaE psaF null mutant. Concomitantly, the amplitude of the fast kinetic phase increased by a factor of 1.8 and 2.0 in the psaF and psaE psaF null mutants, respectively, at the expense of the slow kinetic phase. The change in ratio of the fast to slow kinetic phases is explained as either a redirection of electron transfer through A1B at the expense of A1A, or a shortening of the lifetime of A1A(-) to become identical to that of A1B(-). The constant lifetime and the characteristics of the near-UV spectrum of the fast kinetic phase favor the former explanation. A unified hypothesis is presented of a displacement of the A-jk1 alpha-helix and switchback loop, which would weaken the H-bond from Leu722 to A1A, accounting for the acceleration of the slow kinetic phase, as well as weaken the H-bond from Tyr696 to A0A, accounting for the bias of electron transfer in favor of the PsaB branch of cofactors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.904

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhotochemistry and PhotobiologySame topicPhotosynthetic Processes and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207