Short-Term Plasticity of Spinal Reflex Excitability Induced by Rhythmic Arm Movement
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Rhythmic arm movement reduces Hoffmann (H)-reflex amplitudes in leg muscles by modulation of presynaptic inhibition in group Ia transmission. To date only the acute effect occurring during arm movement has been studied. We hypothesized that the excitability of soleus H-reflexes would remain suppressed beyond a period of arm cycling conditioning. Subjects used a customized arm ergometer to perform rhythmic 1-Hz arm cycling for 30 min. H-reflexes were evoked before, during, and after arm cycling via stimulation of the tibial nerve in the popliteal fossa. The most important finding was that the H-reflex amplitudes were significantly suppressed during and ≤20 min after arm cycling had been terminated. Thus remote arm cycling can induce adaptive plasticity in the soleus H-reflex pathway that persists beyond the period of conditioning. In an additional experiment, the prolonged effect of arm cycling combined with cutaneous superficial radial (SR) nerve stimulation was investigated. Cutaneous stimulation cancelled the prolonged suppression of H-reflex amplitude induced by arm cycling. Because SR nerve stimulation facilitates soleus H-reflex via reducing the level of Ia presynaptic inhibition, persistence in presynaptic inhibitory pathways is suggested as the underlying neural mechanism. The simplest explanation of this observation is plateau potential-like behavior of interneurons mediating presynaptic inhibition of Ia afferent transmission.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".