Bibliographic record
Abstract
Annually we recognize the papers published in IFT's peer-reviewed journals 2 years prior to the last full publishing year that have been most-cited as reported in Web of Knowledge. Similarly we recognize papers in each of IFT's online journals: most downloaded for JFSE and most cited papers in CRFSFS. In addition, each author receives special recognition and a certificate of achievement at the Reviewers’ Reception at IFT's Annual Meeting and Food Expo. Here are the most-cited or most-downloaded papers from 2009. Congratulations to all of the authors! For 2009, 306 out of 397 papers were cited at least once, the median paper had 2 citations, and the most cited paper had 22 citations. Here are the most cited by section, in order of times cited according to Web of Science: Sensory and Food Quality Wright BJ, Zevchak SE, Wright JM, and Drake MA. 2009. The Impact of Agglomeration and Storage on Flavor and Flavor Stability of Whey Protein Concentrate 80% and Whey Protein Isolate. J Food Sci 74(1):S17–29. doi: 10.1111/j.1750–3841.2008.00975.x. January/February 2009. Cited 21 times Health, Nutrition and Food Khanal RC, Howard LR, Brownmiller CR, and Prior RL. 2009. Influence of Extrusion Processing on Procyanidin Composition and Total Anthocyanin Contents of Blueberry Pomace. J Food Sci 74(2):H52–58. doi: 10.1111/j.1750–3841.2009.01063.x. March 2009. Cited 15 times. Nanoscale Food Science, Engineering, and Technology Azeredo H MC, Mattoso LHC, Wood D, Williams TG, Avena-Bustillos RJ, and McHugh TH. 2009. Nanocomposite Edible Films from Mango Puree Reinforced with Cellulose Nanofibers. J Food Sci 74(5):N31–35. doi: 10.1111/j.1750–3841.2009.01186.x. June/July 2009. Cited 14 times. Food Microbiology and Safety Jin T, Sun D, Su JY, Zhang H, and Sue H-J. 2009. Antimicrobial Efficacy of Zinc Oxide Quantum Dots against Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella Enteritidis, and Escherichia coli O157:H7. J Food Sci 74:M46–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1750–3841.2008.01013.x. January/February 2009. Cited 13 times. Food Chemistry Viskelis P, Rubinskienė M, Jasutienė I, Šarkinas A, Daubaras R, and Česonienė L. 2009. Anthocyanins, Antioxidative, and Antimicrobial Properties of American Cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon Ait.) and their Press Cakes. J Food Sci 74(2):C157–161. doi: 10.1111/j.1750–3841.2009.01066.x. March 2009. Cited 13 times. Concise Reviews/Hypothesis Iyer R and Tomar SK. 2009. Folate: A Functional Food Constituent. Journal of Food Science, 74: R114–R122. doi: 10.1111/j.1750–3841.2009.01359.x. November/December 2009. Cited 12 times. Food Engineering and Physical Properties Rousseau D, Ghosh S, and Park H. 2009. Comparison of the Dispersed Phase Coalescence Mechanisms in Different Tablespreads. J Food Sci 74(1):E1–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1750–3841.2008.00978.x. January/February 2009. Cited 9 times. Toxicology and Chemical Food Safety Rawn DFK, Breakell K, Verigin V, Nicolidakis H, Sit D, and Feeley M. 2009. Persistent Organic Pollutants in Fish Oil Supplements on the Canadian Market: Polychlorinated Biphenyls and Organochlorine Insecticides. J Food Science, 74(1):T14–19. doi: 10.1111/j.1750–3841.2008.01020.x. January/February 2009. Cited 6 times. For 2009, 21 of 25 papers were cited at least once with a median citation of 5. Please note that our recently departed colleague, Professor David Min, was co-author on the 3rd-most-cited paper. Sila DN, Van Buggenhout S, Duvetter T, Fraeye I, De Roeck A, Van Loey A, and Hendrickx M. 2009. Pectins in Processed Fruits and Vegetables: Part II—Structure–Function Relationships. Comp Rev Food Sci Food Saf 8(2):86–104. doi: 10.1111/j.1541–4337.2009.00071.x. April 2009. Cited 27 times. Van Buggenhout S, Sila DN, Duvetter T, Van Loey A, and Hendrickx M. 2009. Pectins in Processed Fruits and Vegetables: Part III—Texture Engineering. Comp Rev Food Sci Food Saf 8(2):105–117. doi: 10.1111/j.1541–4337.2009.00072.x. April 2009. Cited 26 times. Choe E and Min D B. 2009. Mechanisms of Antioxidants in the Oxidation of Foods. Comp Rev Food Sci Food Saf 8:345–358. doi: 10.1111/j.1541–4337.2009.00085.x. October 2009. Cited 19 times. JFSE is not included in a citation index but we do have the number of downloads for each paper. Shelly J. Schmidt has co-authored the most-downloaded paper 2 years in a row. Schmidt SJ and Lee JW. 2009. How Does the Freezer Burn Our Food? J Food Sci Ed 8(2):45–52. April 2009. doi: 10.1111/j.1541–4329.2009.00072.x. Downloaded 1165 times. Hicks DT, Pivarnik LF, McDermott R, Richard N, Hoover DG, and Kniel KE. 2009. Consumer Awareness and Willingness to Pay for High-Pressure Processing of Ready-to-Eat Food. J Food Sci Ed 8(2):32–38. doi: 10.1111/j.1541–4329.2009.00069.x. April 2009. Downloaded 478 times. In closing, I would like to thank all authors who have submitted articles to our journals and issue a challenge. Our goal is to provide the best window of your research to the world. Send us your best, and we will do our best to get your manuscript on the list of most cited.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".