Favorable Long-Term Results of Prosthetic Arthroplasty of the Knee for Distal Femur Neoplasms
Bibliographic record
Abstract
UNLABELLED: We evaluated implant survival, late complications prompting reoperation and functional outcome in long-term (> 5 years) survivors of bone neoplasms of the distal femur treated with osteoarticular resection and segmental rotating hinge total knee arthroplasty. We retrospectively reviewed 83 patients who survived more than 5 years after the first procedure. Seventy-four of the 83 patients have retained a mobile knee joint. At a median followup of 146 months (range, 62-252 months), 22 patients required 26 additional procedures for a prosthesis-specific event (n = 24) or tumor recurrence (n = 2) after reaching 5-year followup. Aseptic loosening (n = 7) and component breakage (n = 2) occurred between 5 and 10 years. Polyethylene wear (n = 12) occurred only after 10 years. One late tumor recurrence at 62 months prompted amputation. All other patients retained a mobile knee joint. Functional outcome was excellent with a median Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score of 88% and a median Toronto Extremity Severity Scale score of 94%. Patients with bone neoplasms who survive more than 5 years after limb salvage with a segmental rotating hinge total knee arthroplasty can expect to retain a mobile knee joint and function consistently at a high level. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, Level III-2 (retrospective cohort study). See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".