MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

AAFC annual crop inventory

2013· article· en· W2075271931 on OpenAlexaffabout
Thierry Fisette, Patrick Rollin, Ziad Aly, Les Campbell, Bahram Daneshfar, P. Filyer, Adam N. H. Smith, Andrew Davidson, Jiali Shang, Ian Jarvis

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRemote Sensing in Agriculture
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGrowing seasonAgricultureService (business)CropEnvironmental scienceAgricultural engineeringBusinessComputer scienceEnvironmental resource managementAgricultural scienceAgricultural economicsGeographyForestryMarketingEngineeringAgronomyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Understanding the state and trends in agriculture production is essential to combat both short-term and long-term threats to stable and reliable access to food for all, and to ensure a profitable agricultural sector. In 2007, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC) took its first steps towards the development of an operational software system for mapping the crop types of individual fields using satellite observations. Focusing on the Prairie Provinces in 2009 and 2010, a Decision Tree (DT) based methodology was applied using optical (Landsat-5, AWiFS, DMC, SPOT) and radar (Radarsat-2) imagery. For the 2011 growing season and further years, this activity is extended to other provinces in support of a national crop inventory. At present, this approach can consistently deliver a crop inventory that meets the overall target accuracy of at least 85% at a final spatial resolution of 30m. To achieve full operational status, however, further development is required to optimize the data processing chain. Crop maps covering Canada's entire agricultural region are typically delivered eight months following the end of the growing season. To better meet the needs of AAFC and its partners, as well as those of potential new users, map delivery needs to be more timely. Indeed, there is considerable demand for two map products: an estimated within-season inventory (released during the growing season) as well as a final end-of-season inventory (released shortly after the end of the growing season). To this end, Earth Observation Service (EOS) staff is implementing a new and fully automated crop classifier that should significantly reduce production time. In 2012, the lack of affordable optical data forced AAFC to rely mostly on RADARSAT-2 data. This brings new challenges, given a doubling of the number of images as compared to 2011. In the coming years, new EO data (Landsat 8, Radarsat Constellation Mission, Sentinel-2) will have a significant positive impact on the quality of the AAFC crop inventory.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.312
Threshold uncertainty score0.620

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0070.008
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0840.047

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations129
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRemote Sensing in AgricultureFrench-language works237,207