fMRI in Patients With Motor Conversion Symptoms and Controls With Simulated Weakness
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Conversion disorder (motor type) describes weakness that is not due to recognized disease or conscious simulation but instead is thought to be a “psychogenic” phenomenon. It is a common clinical problem in neurology but its neural correlates remain poorly understood. Objective: To compare the neural correlates of unilateral functional weakness in conversion disorder with those in healthy controls asked to simulate unilateral weakness. Methods: Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used to examine whole brain activations during ankle plantarflexion in four patients with unilateral ankle weakness due to conversion disorder and four healthy controls simulating unilateral weakness. Group data were analyzed separately for patients and controls. Results: Both patients and controls activated the motor cortex (paracentral lobule) contralateral to the “weak” limb less strongly and more diffusely than the motor cortex contralateral to the normally moving leg. Patients with conversion disorder activated a network of areas including the putamen and lingual gyri bilaterally, left inferior frontal gyrus, left insula, and deactivated right middle frontal and orbitofrontal cortices. Controls simulating weakness, but not cases, activated the contralateral supplementary motor area. Conclusions: Unilateral weakness in established conversion disorder is associated with a distinctive pattern of activation, which overlaps with but is different from the activation pattern associated with simulated weakness. The overall pattern suggests more complex mental activity in patients with conversion disorder than in controls. BA = Brodmann area; DLPFC = dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; DSM-IV = Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Diseases, fourth revision; EPI = echo planar imaging; fMRI = functional magnetic resonance imaging; ICD-10 = International Classification of Diseases, version 10; MNI = Montreal Neurological Institute; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging; NCS = nerve conduction studies; PET = positron emission tomography; SMA = supplementary motor area; SPECT = single photon emission computed tomography; SPM99 = statistical parametric mapping software.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".