MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The cationic C‐terminus of rat Muc2 facilitates dimer formation post translationally and is subsequently removed by furin

2000· article· en· W2075355135 on OpenAlexaff
Gongqiao Xu, Sherilyn L. Bell, D. McCool, J. Forstner

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Biochemistry · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGlycosylation and Glycoproteins Research
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFurinCleavage (geology)MucinAmino acidCationic polymerizationChemistryDimerBiochemistryMutantMolecular biologyBiologyStereochemistryEnzymeGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Earlier immunolocalization experiments showed that the extreme cationic C-terminus of the rat intestinal mucin Muc2 (RMC) was present at the base of intestinal goblet cells in the vicinity of ER and golgi compartments, but was not found with the rest of the mucin in apical storage granules. This prompted us to investigate the possibility that an early proteolytic cleavage reaction occurs post-translationally. A plasmid pRMC, encoding the C-terminal 534 amino acids of the mucin, was expressed in COS-7 cells and was shown to undergo cleavage at an R-T-R-R sequence located within the C-terminal 14 amino acids. Cleavage did not occur with the construct RMCfH, a furin site-mutated (A-T-A-A) counterpart of pRMCH (poly His6 tagged RMC). Addition of a furin inhibitor to COS-7 cell incubations also prevented cleavage of RMC and RMCH products. 35S pulse-chase kinetic experiments revealed that a truncated mutant lacking the C-terminal 14 amino acids (pRMCDeltaCT) forms faulty (doublet) dimers in the ER. These were not secreted as efficiently as the normal dimer of wild-type (pRMC) constructs. Thus the cationic C-terminus of rMuc2 apppears to facilitate the correct formation of normal Muc2 domain dimers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.057
Threshold uncertainty score0.305

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of BiochemistrySame topicGlycosylation and Glycoproteins ResearchFrench-language works237,207