MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2075491907 · doi:10.1049/iet-ipr.2007.0096

Spatially adaptive thresholding in wavelet domain for despeckling of ultrasound images

2009· article· en· W2075491907 on OpenAlexaff
M. I. H. Bhuiyan, M. Omair Ahmad, M.N.S. Swamy

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Image Processing · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Signal Denoising Methods
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpeckle noiseArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceWaveletThresholdingSpeckle patternPattern recognition (psychology)Noise (video)Maximum a posteriori estimationComputer visionNoise reductionImage qualityEstimatorMathematicsImage (mathematics)Statistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ultrasound imaging is widely used for diagnostic purposes among the clinicians. A major problem concerning the ultrasound images is their inherent corruption by the multiplicative speckle noise that hampers the quality of the diagnosis, and reduces the efficiency of the algorithms for automatic image processing. In this paper, we propose a new spatially adaptive wavelet-based method in order to reduce the speckle noise from ultrasound images. A spatially adaptive threshold is introduced for denoising the coefficients of log-transformed ultrasound images. The threshold is obtained from a Bayesian maximum a posteriori estimator that is developed using a symmetric normal inverse Gaussian probability density function (PDF) as a prior for modelling the coefficients of the log-transformed reflectivity. A simple and fast method is provided to estimate the parameters of the prior PDF from the neighbouring coefficients. Extensive simulations are carried out using synthetically speckled and ultrasound images. It is shown that the proposed method outperforms several existing techniques in terms of the signal-to-noise ratio, edge preservation index and structural similarity index and visual quality, and in addition, is able to maintain the diagnostically significant details of ultrasound images.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations79
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIET Image ProcessingSame topicImage and Signal Denoising MethodsFrench-language works237,207