Preferential Oxidation of Zinc Finger 2 in Estrogen Receptor DNA-binding Domain Prevents Dimerization and, Hence, DNA Binding
Bibliographic record
Abstract
For approximately one-third of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer patients, extracted tumor ER is unable to bind to its cognate DNA estrogen response element (ERE), an effect that is partly reversible by the thiol-reducing agent dithiothreitol (DTT). Full-length (67 kDa) ER or its 11 kDa recombinant DNA-binding domain (ER-DBD) is also susceptible to loss of structure and function by the action of oxidants such as diamide and hydrogen peroxide; however, prior DNA binding by ER or ER-DBD protects against this oxidant induced loss of function. The ER-DBD contains two (Cys)(4)-liganded zinc finger motifs that cooperate to stabilize a rigid DNA-binding recognition helix and a flexible helix-supported dimerization loop, respectively. Comparisons between synthetic peptide analogues of each zinc finger and recombinant ER-DBD in the presence of zinc by electrophoretic mobility shift assay, circular dichroism, and mass spectrometry confirm that cooperativity between these zinc fingers is required for both ER-DBD structure (alpha-helicity) and function (dimeric DNA binding). Rapid proteolytic digestion of monomeric, non-DNA-bound ER-DBD followed by HPLC-MS analysis of the resulting peptides demonstrates that zinc inhibits thiol oxidation of the DNA-binding finger, but not the finger supporting the flexible dimerization loop, which remains sensitive to internal disulfide formation. These findings indicate that the loss of ER DNA-binding function in extracts from some primary breast tumors and in ER or ER-DBD exposed to thiol-reacting oxidants results from this asymmetric zinc finger susceptibility to disulfide formation that prevents dimerization. Although ER-DBD contains several strategically located methionine residues, they are less susceptible to oxidation than the thiol groups and, thus, afford no protection against cysteine oxidation and consequent loss of ER DNA-binding function.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".