Predicting plant species diversity in response to disturbance magnitude in grassland remnants of central Alberta
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Intermediate Disturbance Hypothesis states that the greatest species diversity occurs at intermediate levels of disturbance because species coexistence is maintained at a nonequilibrium state and no strong competitor can dominate completely. On the other hand, diversity of exotic species is expected to increase with the disturbance magnitude. These patterns were tested for in this study. The cover of all vascular plants, mosses, and lichens in 1 × 1 m plots across a range of disturbance levels was sampled in 11 remnant grasslands within the Aspen Parkland Ecoregion of central Alberta, western Canada. The Intermediate Disturbance Hypothesis was supported for small-scale within-patch diversity for total species richness and Simpson's diversity index. Lower species diversity was found in undisturbed and lightly grazed as well as in highly disturbed plots. Intermediate levels of disturbance had reduced dominance of Festuca hallii (Vasey) Piper and increased abundance of most other species; this gave the highest species diversity. The species richness and diversity of exotic plant species showed a significant positive relationship with the magnitude of the disturbance. Understanding relationships between disturbance and plant species diversity, especially exotic plants, can influence management decisions on what disturbance regime is conducive to maintaining natural plant communities.Key words: Intermediate Disturbance Hypothesis, diversity, exotic species, grassland.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".