Regulation of indoleacetic acid production in<i>Pseudomonas putida</i>GR12-2 by tryptophan and the stationary-phase sigma factor RpoS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The phytohormone indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) accumulates in the culture medium of the plant growth-promoting bacterium Pseudomonas putida GR12-2 only when grown in the presence of exogenous tryptophan, suggesting that expression of indolepyruvate decarboxylase, a key enzyme in the IAA biosynthesis pathway in this bacterium, may be regulated by tryptophan. To test this hypothesis, we isolated the promoter region for the ipdc gene encoding indolepyruvate decarboxylase by inverse polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and inserted it upstream of the bioluminescent reporter gene luxAB on a plasmid in P. putida GR12-2. Activity of the ipdc promoter, measured by quantifying light production, increased fivefold in the presence of L-tryptophan, confirming that ipdc expression is induced by tryptophan. In addition, transcription of ipdc is regulated by the stationary phase sigma factor RpoS: the ipdc promoter contains a sequence similar to the RpoS recognition sequence, and transformation of P. putida GR12-2 with a plasmid carrying rpoS under the control of a constitutive promoter induced promoter activity before the onset of stationary phase when RpoS is not normally produced and prolonged a higher level of transcription at the later stages of the cell cycle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".