MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2075539455 · doi:10.1080/09638280801976159

Disability in end-stage knee osteoarthritis

2008· article· en· W2075539455 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDisability and Rehabilitation · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTotal Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWOMACMedicineOsteoarthritisPhysical therapyBody mass indexStairsRange of motionIsometric exerciseKnee painPhysical medicine and rehabilitationInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To examine the attributes of disability in end-stage knee osteoarthritis (OA) by analyzing the relationships between self-reported disability and objectively measured physical function after controlling pain, personal characteristic factors, and pathophysiological factors. METHODS: The present study adopted a cross-sectional design. The subjects (n=88, aged 60-80 years) were scheduled for primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) due to knee OA. Self-reported disability and pain were measured with the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities OA Index (WOMAC) and the RAND 36-item Health Survey 1.0 (RAND-36). Physical performance tests included a 15-m walk test and stair performance. Knee isometric muscle strength was measured. A clinical examination included analyses of comorbidity, body mass index (BMI), and a detailed knee examination: The flexion range of motion (ROM) was measured; the presence of varus/valgus malalignments and antero-posterior laxity was assessed. Radiographs were analyzed with the Kellgren-Lawrence grading scale. RESULTS: In the linear regression model the WOMAC pain score, antero-posterior laxity of the knee, age, and BMI accounted for 54.8% of the variance in the WOMAC function score. In the bivariate analyses the WOMAC function score had a positive correlation with the 15-m walk (r(s)=0.32, p=0.003), stairs up (r(s)=0.40, p=0.001), and stairs down (r(s)=0.38, p=0.001) tests, and a negative correlation with RPT extension (r(s)=-0.45, p < 0.001) and RPT flexion (r(s)=-0.39, p=0.001) of the affected side and RPT flexion (r(s)=-0.39, p <0.001) of the contralateral side. The results of the physical performance tests also correlated with the RAND-36 Physical function (PF) score. Comorbid diseases and pain deteriorated the results of the physical performance tests and self-reported disability. Female gender deteriorated the results of the physical performance tests and the RAND-36 PF, but not the WOMAC function score. Malalignments, restriction in the flexion ROM of the knee, and the radiologic severity of knee OA did not affect self-reported disability. CONCLUSION: Pain, BMI, and antero-posterior laxity of the knee joint were major attributes of self-reported disability. The negative effect of comorbid diseases and female gender on health-related quality of life was significant. The results of objectively measured physical performance tests correlated with self-reported disability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it