A stress echocardiography study of cardiac function during progressive exercise in pediatric oncology patients treated with anthracyclines
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Anthracycline-treated patients (AP) are at risk for cardiac dysfunction years after treatment. Cardiac function has not been evaluated during exercise in AP. The purpose of this study was to assess exercise tolerance, left ventricular (LV) function, and hemodynamics during progressive exercise. PROCEDURE: We studied 47 AP (cumulative dose: 36-504 mg/m(2)) who were in complete remission and 12 healthy controls (CON). AP were further grouped by cumulative dose (LOW <or= 260 mg/m(2); HIGH >or= 260 mg/m(2)) and resting echocardiographic function. All subjects performed 3-min incremental stages on a semi-recumbent cycle ergometer until volitional fatigue. Using echocardiography and Doppler, LV dimensions, posterior wall thickness (LVPWs), peak aortic velocity (PAoV), shortening fraction (SF), rate-corrected mean velocity of fiber shortening (MVCFc), wall stress at peak systole (sigmaPS), stroke volume index (SVI), and cardiac index (CI) were determined. Measurements were performed at rest, during each stage of exercise, and in recovery. RESULTS: AP did less work than CON (P < 0.050). CON and LOW had similar resting function, while HIGH had a lower SF and MVCFc (P < 0.050) and a higher sigmaPS (P < 0.001). Resting SVI and CI were also lower in HIGH. At peak exercise, MVCFc and sigmaPS remained different in HIGH, and both AP groups had a lower SF, SVI, and CI (P < 0.001). AP had an abnormal SVI response to exercise. AP showed a smaller initial increase in SVI that was not maintained throughout exercise. CONCLUSIONS: AP have reduced exercise tolerance. There also appears to be a dose-related effect on myocardial contractility and SVI. These findings may help to guide treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".