171 IN VIVO AND IN VITRO MATURATION OF WOOD BISON (BISON BISON ATHABASCAE) CUMULUS–OOCYTE COMPLEXES DURING THE OVULATORY SEASON
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Technologies are being developed to conserve the genetic diversity of wood bison. Knowledge of the characteristics of in vivo and in vitro maturation of the cumulus–oocyte complex (COC) are needed in wood bison to design efficient in vitro embryo production protocols. The objectives were to (1) determine the optimal interval after hCG treatment for in vivo maturation of COC in superstimulated wood bison, and (2) compare the characteristics of COC after in vitro and in vivo maturation. Ovarian synchronization was induced in 25 bison during October and November by giving a luteolytic dose of prostaglandin followed 8 days later by follicular ablation (Day –1). Ovarian superstimulation was induced with FSH (Folltropin-V) given i.m. on Day 0 (300 mg) and Day 2 (100 mg). A second luteolytic dose of prostaglandin was given on Day 3. Bison were assigned randomly to 5 groups (n = 5/group). The COC were collected by transvaginal follicle aspiration on Day 4 and were either assessed immediately (0 h, control), or matured in vitro for 24 or 30 h (in vitro maturation), or collected on Day 5 (in vivo maturation), 24 or 30 h after bison were given 2000 IU of hCG i.m. on Day 4. In vitro maturation was done in TCM-199 with 5% calf serum, 5 µg mL–1 LH, 0.5 µg mL–1 FSH, and 0.05 µg mL–1 gentamicin, at 38.5°C and in a 5% CO2 humidified atmosphere. Nuclear maturation was classified as germinal vesicle (GV), germinal vesicle breakdown (GVBD), metaphase I (MI), or metaphase II (MII) with anti-lamin AC/DAPI staining. Groups were compared by analysis of variance and Fisher's exact test (Table 1). A mean (±s.e.m.) of 7.3 ± 1.7 COC were collected per bison, with no difference among groups. The COC in the control (0 h) group were at the nonexpanded GV stage. Cumulus cells were more expanded after in vivo than in vitro maturation, and the percentage of fully expanded COC was the highest in the 30-h in vivo maturation group (87%; P < 0.05). The greatest number of oocytes reached MII stage after 24 h of in vitro maturation, and 30 h of in vivo maturation. In conclusion, nuclear maturation occurred more quickly in vitro compared with in vivo, but the degree and incidence of cumulus expansion was greater after in vivo maturation. The competence of oocytes to undergo fertilization and develop into embryos remains to be investigated. Table 1. Cumulus expansion and nuclear maturation of wood bison oocytes
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".