Full or Partial Substitution of the Reactive Center Loop of α-1-Proteinase Inhibitor by that of Heparin Cofactor II: P1 Arg Is Required for Maximal Thrombin Inhibition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The abundant plasma protein alpha(1)-proteinase inhibitor (alpha(1)-PI) physiologically inhibits neutrophil elastase (NE) and factor XIa and belongs to the serine protease inhibitor (serpin) protein superfamily. Inhibitory serpins possess a surface peptide domain called the reactive center loop (RCL), which contains the P1-P1' scissile peptide bond. Conversion of this bond in alpha(1)-PI from Met-Ser to Arg-Ser in alpha(1)-PI Pittsburgh (M358R) redirects alpha(1)-PI from inhibiting NE to inhibiting thrombin (IIa), activated protein C (APC), and other proteases. In contrast to either the wild-type or M358R alpha(1)-PI, heparin cofactor II (HCII) is a IIa-specific inhibitor with an atypical Leu-Ser reactive center. We examined the effects of replacement of all or part of the RCL of alpha(1)-PI with the corresponding parts of the HCII RCL on the activity and specificity of the resulting chimeric inhibitors. A series of 12 N-terminally His-tagged alpha(1)-PI proteins differing only in their RCL residues were expressed as soluble proteins in Escherichia coli. Substitution of the P16-P3' loop of alpha(1)-PI with that of HCII increased the low intrinsic antithrombin activity of alpha(1)-PI to near that of heparin-free HCII, while analogous substitution of the P2'-P3' dipeptide surpassed this level. However, gel-based complexing and quantitative kinetic assays showed that all mutant proteins inhibited thrombin at less than 2% of the rate of alpha(1)-PI (M358R) unless the P1 residue was also mutated to Arg. An alpha(1)-PI (P16-P3' HCII/M358R) variant was only 3-fold less active than M358R against IIa but 70-fold less active against APC. The reduction in anti-APC activity is desired in an antithrombotic agent, but the improvement in inhibitory profile came at the cost of a 3.5-fold increase in the stoichiometry of inhibition. Our results suggest that, while P1 Arg is essential for maximal antithrombin activity in engineered alpha(1)-PI proteins, substitution of the corresponding HCII residues can enhance thrombin specificity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".