MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2075732246 · doi:10.2523/iptc-15267-ms

Developing a Stage Tool for Cemented Back Monobore Completions with Open Hole Multi-Stage Systems in the Montney

2011· article· en· W2075732246 on OpenAlex
Kyle Kimmitt

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Petroleum Technology Conference · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDrilling and Well Engineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpark plugEngineeringCollarDrillCasingStage (stratigraphy)Petroleum engineeringCompletion (oil and gas wells)Mechanical engineeringGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Challenges associated with cementing horizontal wellbores, as well as the higher operational time and costs associated with the cemented liner, plug and perf method, has resulted in many operators switching to open hole multi-stage system (OHMS) completions. In addition, production increases have been realized with OHMS due to access to the entire open hole lateral. To further optimize economics, cemented back monobore completions with OHMS are becoming the completion method of choice for operators. This is because they save on wellbore costs by eliminating the intermediate casing. Instead, the build section of the wellbore is cemented back to surface using a stage tool once the liner is installed. In addition, the cemented back method allows for OHMS systems to be run in on liner eliminating the need to trip out the running string and trip in the frac string. This paper outlines the operational procedure for cemented back monobore OHMS completions. Due to various issues with conventional plug-type cementing stage tools a new hydraulically activated, mechanically closed cementing stage collar was designed to open/close without the use of a plug/dart. The new stage tool addresses the operational issues encountered with conventional tools and further reduces costs by reducing rig time. With the new stage collar, there is no drill out of plugs and cement after the cementing operation, eliminating debris that could be problematic for the OHMS functioning. The development of the new stage collar through lab testing and field trials is discussed. This technology has been successfully used in various formations in Canada and the United States. This paper presents case study examples of installations in the Montney formation. Introduction Geology of the Montney. The Montney formation covers an area of approximately 246,000 km2 (95,000 sq. mi.) stretching across Alberta and British Columbia (Figure 1). It is a leading example of an unconventional gas play in the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin containing vast quantities of proven gas reserves. Estimates of gas in place are up to 700 Tcf. The Montney consists of four distinct intervals: the Upper, Middle, Middle Lower and Lower (National Energy Board, Canada). Characterized by its low permeability (0.01 - 0.5 mD) and thick stack, the Montney is a prime candidate for horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing techniques. The formation is a blend of sandstone, siltstone and shale intervals with porosity up to 8% and true vertical depth to 3,950 m (13,000 ft).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.856
Threshold uncertainty score0.564

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.103
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it