Spectral compression using subspace clustering
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This article describes a subspace clustering strategy for the spectral compression of multispectral images. Unlike standard principal component analysis, this approach finds clusters in several different subspaces of different dimension. Consequently, instead of representing all spectra in a single low‐dimensional subspace of a fixed dimension, spectral data are assigned to multiple subspaces having a range of dimensions from one to eight. In other words, this strategy allows us to distribute spectra into different subspaces thereby obtaining the best fit for each. As a result, more resources can be allocated to those spectra that need many dimensions for accurate representation and fewer resources to those that can be modeled using fewer dimensions. For a given compression ratio, this trade off reduces the overall reconstruction error. In the case of compressing multispectral images, this initial compression method is followed by JPEG2000 compression in order to remove the spatial redundancy in the data as well. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Col Res Appl, 41, 7–15, 2016
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it