Effect of Grain Size on the Corrosion Resistance of Friction Stir Welded Mg Alloy AZ31B Joints
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of this study was to clarify the effect of grain size on the corrosion rate across friction stir welded AZ31B joints when exposed in aqueous NaCl solutions. Grain size variations were achieved by preparing welded joints using AZ31B in different tempers. Single potentiodynamic polarization measurements made on the isolated base metal and stir zone in 0.6 M NaCl solution revealed no significant difference between the anodic kinetics, but revealed an apparent difference between the cathodic kinetics. The attempt to correlate extracted corrosion current density (icorr) values to grain size (d−0.5) revealed that the slope coefficient was insignificantly different from zero, meaning that no meaningful correlation exists (albeit during the corrosion propagation stage). Scanning vibrating electrode technique (SVET) measurements across an intact AZ31B-O welded joint revealed that grain size had a more complex effect on the anodic and cathodic kinetics of the filiform-like corrosion exhibited in 0.86 M NaCl solution. Grain size had an effect on filament initiation as it consistently occurred on the surface of the base alloy (coarser-grained structure). In contrast, grain size had no effect on filament propagation as the anodic and cathodic kinetics were unaffected when moving from the base metal (coarser-grained surface) across the stir zone (finer-grained surface).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it