The beneficial effect of alfuzosin 10 mg once daily in ‘real‐life’ practice on lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), quality of life and sexual dysfunction in men with LUTS and painful ejaculation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and safety of the selective alpha(1)-blocker alfuzosin in men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and painful ejaculation, compared with those with LUTS only, as painful ejaculation is one of the most prevalent, differentiating and bothersome symptoms in men with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 4857 sexually active men with LUTS had an evaluable answer to the Danish Prostate Symptom Score for Sexual Symptoms question related to pain/discomfort on ejaculation at enrolment in a 6-month open-label study with alfuzosin 10 mg once daily. Efficacy was analysed at the endpoint in the intent-to-treat population. RESULTS: Of the 4857 men, 997 (20.5%) had pain/discomfort on ejaculation and 889/997 (89.2%) considered it was a problem. At inclusion, men with painful ejaculation had more severe LUTS and bother than men with LUTS only. Erectile dysfunction (ED) and reduced ejaculation were more prevalent (74.5% and 71.9%, respectively) and bothersome in men with painful ejaculation than in those with no pain (59.6% and 57.4%, respectively). Under alfuzosin treatment, all variables in both groups significantly improved from baseline; men with painful ejaculation compared to LUTS-only had similar improvements in weighted scores for LUTS (-7.8 vs -7.7), bother (-1.7 vs -1.7), and reduced ejaculate (-0.5 vs -0.4) but greater improvements in ED (-0.6 vs -0.4; P < 0.001). The weighted score for painful ejaculation decreased from 2.2 to 0.8 (P < 0.001). Alfuzosin was well tolerated in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: This 6-month open-label study suggests that alfuzosin 10 mg once daily significantly improves LUTS, quality of life and sexual function in men with prostatitis-like symptoms, and is well tolerated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".