Murine binder of sperm protein homolog 1: a new player in HDL-induced capacitation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Binder of sperm (BSP) proteins are ubiquitous among mammals and are exclusively expressed in male genital tract. The main function associated with BSP proteins is their ability to promote sperm capacitation. In mice, two proteins (BSP protein homolog 1 (BSPH1) and BSPH2) have been studied. Using recombinant strategies, BSPH1 was found to bind to epididymal sperm membranes and promote sperm capacitation in vitro. The goal of this study was to evaluate the role of native murine BSPH1 protein in sperm capacitation induced by BSA and HDLs. The effect of antibodies, antigen-binding fragments (Fabs), and F(ab')2 specific for murine BSPH1 on BSA- and HDL-induced capacitation was tested. Results indicate that BSPH1 has no direct role in BSA-induced capacitation. However, antibodies, Fabs, and F(ab')(2) could block capacitation induced by HDLs and could inhibit the HDL-induced increase in tyrosine phosphorylation, suggesting a specific interaction between HDLs and BSPH1. Results indicate that murine BSPH1 proteins in mice could be a new important piece of the puzzle in sperm capacitation induced by HDLs. As murine BSPH1 is orthologous to human BSPH1, this study could also lead to new insights into the functions and the importance of the human protein in male fertility.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".