MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2075819427 · doi:10.1063/1.4730431

Light attenuation experiments on double diffusive plumes and fountains

2012· article· en· W2075819427 on OpenAlexafffund
Bruce Sutherland, Brace Lee, Joseph K. Ansong

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics of Fluids · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWind and Air Flow Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric SciencesUniversities Space Research Association
KeywordsPlumeBuoyancyPhysicsMechanicsAttenuationTurbulenceEddyRADIUSNeutral buoyancyMeteorologyPanacheAtmospheric sciencesOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

By adapting the method of light attenuation to the study of axisymmetric disturbances, we examine the structure of forced plumes and fountains whose buoyancy is set by salinity and/or temperature differences between the turbulent flow and the otherwise stationary ambient. The attenuation measurements are used to infer the statistically steady-state density as a function of radius and height. These compare well with in situ measurements of density taken from a conductivity-temperature probe that repeatedly traversed the centreline of the plume. The theory for forced plumes also agrees well with the centreline density profile. The radial structure of plumes and fountains near the source is found to correspond well to a Gaussian profile, although the standard deviation is found to increase moderately faster with height than spreading rates reported in the existing literature. This is attributed in part to averaging biases resulting from light attenuating through transient eddies. In most experiments, hot and salty fountains reached a steady state height consistent with existing semi-empirical theories for fountains with just one diffusive component. However, if the density of the hot and salty fluid near the source is close to, but moderately larger than, that of the ambient, over time, the fountain is observed to increase progressively in height. This occurs presumably as a consequence of heat diffusion at the top of the fountain making the ambient above it increasingly buoyant relative to the negative buoyancy associated with less diffusive salt.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.254

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics of FluidsSame topicWind and Air Flow StudiesFrench-language works237,207