Pressurization of the Metastatic Femur During Prophylactic Intramedullary Nail Fixation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Venting during prophylactic nailing of metastatic femoral lesions may decrease intramedullary pressures and the risk of fat and tumor embolization. This study aimed to quantify maximum intramedullary pressure levels and durations, and to examine tumor displacement during prophylactic reamed intramedullary nailing of vented and nonvented metastatically involved femora. METHODS: Proximal metastatic defects were simulated in six pairs of cadaveric femora and prophylactically treated using reamed intramedullary nailing with or without proximal and distal vents. Maximum pressures, durations of pressure exceeding embolic threshold levels (25 and 200 mm Hg), and tumor displacement were recorded. RESULTS: Maximum pressures and durations of pressure exceeding embolic thresholds decreased more than 50% with venting (p < 0.05). Distal pressures surpassed the 25-mm Hg threshold even with venting. Post-test sectioning showed increased tumor disbursement in vented specimens. CONCLUSIONS: Venting reduces pressurization during prophylactic reamed intramedullary nailing of femoral metastases, but may increase the spread of tumor to extraskeletal tissue if vented tissue is not contained.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".