MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2075835428 · doi:10.1080/13264820903341605

Lines as Architectural Thinking

2009· article· en· W2075835428 on OpenAlex
Marco Frascari

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueArchitectural Theory Review · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArchitecture and Art History Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArchitectureMateriality (auditing)Inscribed figureVisual artsArt historyEngineeringArchitectural engineeringArtAesthetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Architecture stems from a sapient working together of writing, drawing, and construction lines. The critical study of genetic architectural representations by examination of the sedimentation of architectural materiality inscribed in weathered boards, papers and models develops the ability of architects to become architecturally conscious. Architectural lines are material, spatial, cultural and temporal occurrences of refined multi-sensorial and emotional understandings of architecture. Architectural lines create a graphesis , a course of actions based on factures by which architects actualize future and past architecture into representations. Architectural drawings must not be understood as visualizations of building, but as essential architectural factures. Leon Battista Alberti's term lineamenta carries embedded in itself the idea of facture since Alberti's understanding of lineamenta derives from the use of tracing lines, ropes, ribbons, strings or threads mostly made with flax fibres and used by the builder on construction sites during the facture of buildings. "Tota res aedificatoria lineamentis et structura constituta est." Leon Battista Alberti, De re aedificatoria Notes 1. Unfortunately, sapere and sapore are not anymore cognates in imaginative thinking. Virgil of Toulouse, grammarian of the 6th century, has beautifully shown the connection between sapere and sapore. Virgil of Toulouse, Virgilio Marone grammatico: Epitomi ed Epistole, ed. and trans. G. Polara, Naples: Liguori Editore, 1979. 2. Robin Evans, The Projective Cast: Architecture and Its Three Geometries, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1995. 3. Scientintically, adv. A burlesque nonce-word, formed by a blending of scientifically and tint. 1761 STERNE Tr. Shandy III. v, "He must have redden'd, pictorically and scientintically speaking, six whole tints and a half … above his natural colour." 4. Johanna Drucker, "Digital Ontologies: The Ideality of Form in/and Code Storage—or—Can Graphesis Challenge Mathesis?", Leonardo, 34, 2 (April 2001): 141–145. 5. David Summers, Real Spaces: World Art History and the Rise of Western Modernism, London: Phaidon, 2003. 6. Ernesto De Martino, Sud e magia, Milan: Feltrinelli, 2004. 7. Giuseppe Mazzotta, Cosmopoiesis: The Renaissance Experiment, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2001. 8. Nelson Goodman, Ways of Worldmaking, Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 1978. 9. Leon Battista Alberti, L'architettura di Leonbatista Alberti tradotta in lingua fiorentina da Cosimo Bartoli gentil'huomo & accademico fiorentino. Con la aggiunta de disegni. In Firenze: appresso Lorenzo Torrentino impressor ducale, 1550. 10. John Dee, The Mathematicall Praeface to the Elements of Geometrie of Euclid of Megara (1570), New York: Science History Publications,1975, p. d.iiij. 11. Leon Battista Alberti, L'Architecture et Art de bien bastir du Seigneur Leon Baptiste Albert, Gentilhomme Florentin, divisée en dix livres, Traduicts de Latin en François, par deffunct Jan Martin, Parisien, nagueres Secretaire du Reverendissime Cardinal de Lenoncourt, A Paris: [Imprimé par R. Massellin, pour] J. Kerver, 1553. 12. In architectural terminology the Italian term progetto cannot be translated as "design", since it has broader and idiosyncratic phenomenological connotations. 13. Leon Battista Alberti, L'architettura, (De re aedificatoria), trans. Giovanni Orlandi, vol. 2, Milan: Edizioni Il Polifilo, 1966. 14. Leon Battista Alberti, On the Art of Building in Ten Books, trans. Joseph Rykwert, Neil Leach and Robert Tavernor, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1988. 15. Alberti, On the Art of Building, p. 7 16. The Book of Ezekiel (from the Hebrew Bible) 40:3. 17. Palmira Cipriano, Templum, Rome: University La Sapienza, 1983, pp. 121–142. 18. Cipriano, Templum, p. 123. 19. Alberti, On the Art of Building, p. 219.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.841
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it