MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2075851163 · doi:10.1212/wnl.0b013e3181b59bda

FAMILIAL CONGENITAL MIRROR MOVEMENTS: REPORT OF A LARGE 4-GENERATION FAMILY

2009· article· en· W2075851163 on OpenAlexaff
Myriam Srour, Mathieu Philibert, M. -H. Dion, Antoine Duquette, F. Richer, Guy A. Rouleau, Sylvain Chouinard

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeurological disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePhysical medicine and rehabilitationPediatricsPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

REPORT OF A LARGE 4-GENERATION FAMILYMirror movements (MM) are synkinesias occurring in the opposite side during the intentional use of a limb.They are occasionally present in children, but persistence after age 10 is abnormal.1,2 We have found a large 4-generation family with congenital mirror movements not associated with other neurologic abnormalities.Methods.Nineteen members (11 affected and 8 unaffected) of a 4-generation family with individuals affected with congenital MM were interviewed in a systematic questionnaire that queried perinatal history, development, presence of learning disabilities, and other medical history.Information regarding the onset, distribution, suppressibility, and functional and social impact of MM was obtained.A videotaped examination was performed, and subjects underwent diadochokinesimeter measurement of rapid alternating pronation-supination movements at 2 different velocities.The diadochokinesimeter consisted of 2 hand-held plastic spheres connected to optical encoders, which recorded amplitude and velocity of movement in each hand.3 This project was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite ´de Montre ´al.Results.This French Canadian family originates from the Lanaudie `re region of Quebec.There is no known consanguinity.Transmission is autosomal dominant with high but incomplete penetrance.Penetrance is higher in males (figure).The index case first sought neurologic attention for episodes of fatigue, and MM were incidentally noted on examination.They had been present since childhood, and had never resulted in functional or social impairment.The remainder of the neurologic examination was normal.MRI of the brain and cervical cord was normal.Questionnaire results and clinical features are presented in tables e-1 and e-2 on the Neurology ® Web site at www.neurology.org.More men than women were affected (M:F ϭ 9:2).Perinatal and developmental histories did not differ between affected and

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurologySame topicNeurological disorders and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207