MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2075912815 · doi:10.1097/sga.0b013e3181965d40

Young Peoples' Experience of Living With Ulcerative Colitis and an Ostomy

2009· article· en· W2075912815 on OpenAlexaff
Julie Savard, Roberta L. Woodgate

Bibliographic record

VenueGastroenterology Nursing · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicStoma care and complications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFeelingUlcerative colitisInflammatory bowel diseaseYoung adultLived experiencePsychology of selfMedicineDiseaseAffect (linguistics)PsychologyGerontologyPathologySocial psychologyPsychotherapist

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Inflammatory bowel disease is a significant illness among young people, requiring some of them to get an ostomy; however, there is minimal research that seeks to understand the meanings young people assign to their inflammatory bowel disease experiences. The purpose of this phenomenological study was to arrive at an understanding of the lived experiences of young persons with inflammatory bowel disease and an ostomy. Six young adults (19-24 years of age) diagnosed with ulcerative colitis, and who all had had an operation for a temporary ostomy, participated in individual open-ended interviews. "Concealing and Revealing the Self," which emerged as the essence of young adults' experiences, referred to how much they chose to present their "true" self to others. The concealment of their true self was, in part, due to the symptoms they experienced and the impact that the illness had on their changing bodies. It was not until they were no longer experiencing the symptoms and their bodies returned to normal that they were able to reveal themselves and have a true sense of confidence. Findings also reveal that young persons with ulcerative colitis and an ostomy experience many uneasy feelings that affect their sense of self, which nurses need to acknowledge.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.060
Threshold uncertainty score0.291

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations57
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGastroenterology NursingSame topicStoma care and complicationsFrench-language works237,207