Pharmacology of Nitric Oxide: Molecular Mechanisms and Therapeutic Strategies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
NO is considered to be an ubiquitous endogenous system which takes part in body's homeostatic regulations and in pathological events. NO derives from a) the actions of enzymes, the NO Synthases (NOS), which are constitutives (endothelial NOS (eNOS) and nervous NOS (nNOS)) and generate small amounts of NO and have homeostatic functions: and b) from the actions of inducible NOS (iNOS), which generate large amounts of NO and exert protective actions against noxious agents but also toxic effects (e.g. inhibition of enzymes) through the production of peroxynitrite (ONOO-). Modulation of the L-Arg/NO system may be used to obtain favourable therapeutic results, either by promoting (e.g. with NO donors) or by reducing (e.g. with NOS inhibitors) the production of NO. The present chapter will consider two approaches and four groups of potential therapeutic agents: 1) The stimulation of NO production with; a) agents which improve the efficiency of the Kallikrein-Kinin System; b) NO donors. 2) The reduction of excessive NO production with: a) inhibitors of NO Synthases; b) agents that reduce the formation of reactive nitrogen/ oxygen species (RNS / ROS).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".