MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Advances in Type I Diabetes Associated Tolerance Mechanisms

2008· review· en· W2075969656 on OpenAlexaff
Aziz Alami Chentoufi, Nadine Binder, Noureddine Berka, T. Abunadi, Constantin Polychronakos

Bibliographic record

VenueScandinavian Journal of Immunology · 2008
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDiabetes and associated disorders
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal Children's HospitalUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFOXP3IL-2 receptorBiologyCentral tolerancePeripheral toleranceImmunologyImmune toleranceCell biologyT cellAntigenImmune system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is an autoimmune disease resulting from the destruction of insulin-producing pancreatic beta cells by autoreactive T cells. The polygenic trait for T1D risk implicates many genes that have an impact on fundamental immunological processes such as central and peripheral tolerance. Several pieces of evidence have suggested that many of the genetic loci that are directly linked to type 1 diabetes susceptibility modulate the generation and/or the activation of autoreactive T-lymphocytes. We and others have proposed a critical role for medullary thymic epithelial cells (mTEC) forming the Hassall's corpuscles in T-cell tolerance. Indeed, mTEC have been found to express promiscuous self-antigens, used directly or through thymic dendritic cells to drive either negative selection of insulin-reacting precursors or their differentiation into naturally occurring regulatory Foxp3+ CD4+ CD25+ T cells. In the periphery, naturally occurring Foxp3+ CD4+ CD25+regulatory T (Treg) cells represent the master cells in dominant peripheral T-cell tolerance. The development and function of Treg cells are ultimately linked to IL-2 and Foxp3 expression. This review addresses recent literature and emerging concepts of central and peripheral T-cell tolerance with regards to T1D.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.997
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScandinavian Journal of ImmunologySame topicDiabetes and associated disordersFrench-language works237,207