MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2075988586 · doi:10.1258/ebm.2010.009339

Characterization of porcine pregnane X receptor, farnesoid X receptor and their splice variants

2010· article· en· W2075988586 on OpenAlexafffund
Matthew Gray, Callie B. Pollock, Lawrence B. Schook, E. James Squires

Bibliographic record

VenueExperimental Biology and Medicine · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEstrogen and related hormone effects
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
KeywordsPregnane X receptorTransactivationFarnesoid X receptorConstitutive androstane receptorBiologyReceptorspliceMolecular biologyLuciferaseNuclear receptorBiochemistryGeneGene expressionTranscription factorTransfection

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The pregnane X receptor (PXR; NR1I2) and the farnesoid X receptor (FXR; NR1H4) regulate the expression of many major metabolic enzymes. With the pig being used as a model for humans in metabolic and toxicological studies and also an important food animal, we characterized the transactivation profile of the porcine orthologs of these receptors, pgPXR and pgFXR. We compared the transactivation profiles of these receptors and their splice variants to their human orthologs using mostly endogenous ligands. Five alternatively spliced variants were identified for pgFXR as part of this study, while five alternatively spliced variants of pgPXR had been previously described. Insertions and deletions within these splice variants generated truncated proteins or proteins with altered tertiary structures, resulting in altered transactivation. Realtime polymerase chain reaction analyses showed that the pgPXR variants were present in liver cDNA samples from 3.33% to 7.92% of the total pgPXR, while the pgFXR variants were present from 1.92% to 9.26% of the total pgFXR. pgFXR was fairly evenly expressed in seven different tissues. In a luciferase reporter assay, wild-type pgPXR (pgPXR-WT) and human PXR (hPXR) responded to 12 common ligands, with similar levels of activation occurring for six of these. Wild-type pgFXR (pgFXR-WT) significantly responded to three ligands, two of which also activated hFXR. 3-Methylindole (skatole) was identified as a novel inverse agonist for pgPXR-WT and pgFXR-WT as well as porcine constitutive androstane receptor. None of the pgPXR splice variants (SVs) were active in the luciferase reporter assay on their own; pgFXR-SV1 was activated by chenodeoxycholic acid to a similar degree as pgFXR-WT. When co-transfected with their corresponding wild-type proteins, pgPXR-SV1 and pgFXR-SV1 significantly increased receptor transactivation. In conclusion, pgPXR-WT and pgFXR-WT both responded to ligands that activated their human orthologs, and some of the alternatively spliced variants significantly altered pgPXR and pgFXR transactivation at in vivo expression levels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.386

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExperimental Biology and MedicineSame topicEstrogen and related hormone effectsFrench-language works237,207