Ductile Cracking Evaluation of X80/X100 High Strength Linepipes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The ductile cracking behavior of girth weld joints, in X80 and X100 grade linepipe, was investigated using single edge notched (SENT) specimens, notched round bar (NRB) specimens and wide plate (WP) specimens. FE analyses were carried out to evaluate critical conditions for ductile cracking at the notch tip. The effect of Y/T ratio of base material on ductile cracking for welded joints was also studied. Ductile cracking from the notch tip in WP specimens can be estimated by using the critical equivalent plastic strain, which can be obtained from SENT or NRB specimens. In addition, a simplified prediction method for ductile cracking by using effective opening displacement was proposed and its validity demonstrated by comparison to the equivalent plastic strain at the notch tip. With respect to the influence of material properties on ductile cracking behavior, deformability of joint to ductile cracking was enhanced by reduction of Y/T ratio of base material. Based on the experimental results and FE analyses, pipe design to prevent ductile cracking from surface flaws under large deformation was discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".