MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2076027649 · doi:10.1016/s0736-0266(02)00099-2

Effect of pamidronate on the stimulation of macrophage TNF‐α release by ultra‐high‐molecular‐weight polyethylene particles: a role for apoptosis

2002· article· en· W2076027649 on OpenAlexafffund
Olga L. Huk, David J. Zukor, John Antoniou, Alain Petit

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Orthopaedic Research® · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOrthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityJewish General Hospital
FundersJewish General Hospital
KeywordsStimulationApoptosisMacrophageTumor necrosis factor alphaUltra-high-molecular-weight polyethylenePolyethyleneChemistryCancer researchCell biologyInternal medicineEndocrinologyMaterials scienceMedicineBiologyIn vitroBiochemistryComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The demonstration that one of the mechanisms of action of bisphosphonates (BPs) is the induction of osteoclast and macrophage apoptosis, suggests a potent therapeutic role for the BPs and other apoptosis-modulating agents in the management of periprosthetic osteolysis. The purpose of this study was to improve our understanding of the basic underlying molecular events leading to the inhibitory effect of pamidronate on the macrophage response to ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) particles. Murine J774 macrophages were incubated for 0-72 h in the presence of UHMWPE particles and/or pamidronate. TNF-alpha release was measured by ELISA while poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase (PARP) expression was measured by Western blot. DNA was analyzed on agarose. The appearance of PARP fragment and the fragmentation of DNA were used as markers of apoptosis. We observed a dose-dependent response to UHMWPE particles with TNF-alpha release reaching 4, 10, and 19 times control with 10, 25, and 125 particles/macrophage, respectively. UHMWPE particles (25 particles/macrophage) stimulate TNF-alpha release by a factor of 10, 7, and 6 after 24, 48, and 72 h, respectively, indicating a rapid stimulating effect of UHMWPE particles on TNF-alpha release. Our results also showed that at 10 particles/macrophage, pamidronate inhibits UHMWPE-induced TNF-alpha release by 12%, 14%, and 23% respectively after 24, 48, and 72 h (p<0.05 vs. 24 and 48 h). With 25 particles/macrophage, the inhibition of TNF-alpha reached 9%, 12%, and 15% after 24, 48, and 72 h (p<0.05 vs. 24 h), respectively. There is no significant difference between the inhibition by pamidronate of TNF-alpha release induced by 125 particles/macrophages at 24, 48, and 72 h. When cells are pre-incubated for 48 h with pamidronate prior to addition of UHMWPE particles for 24 h, we observed an increased inhibition of TNF-alpha compared to the co-incubation protocol. The inhibiting effect of pamidronate reaches 56% when pre-incubated with macrophages prior to incubation with 10 particles of UHMWPE/macrophage (p<0.05 vs. co-incubation).Co-incubation of pamidronate with UHMWPE particles also led to the appearance of the proteolytic PARP fragment after 24 h incubation. We also demonstrated the stimulation of DNA fragmentation (DNA laddering) after 48-72 h with pamidronate. The proteolytic cleavage of PARP, an early event in the induction of apoptosis, precedes the inhibition of UHMWPE particle-induced TNF-alpha release by pamidronate whereas the fragmentation of DNA, a late apoptotic event, parallels this inhibition. Our results suggest the induction of macrophage apoptosis is associated with the inhibitory effect of pamidronate on TNF-alpha release. There is a need for the development of medical management of periprosthetic osteolysis. The demonstration that drugs such as pamidronate induce specific apoptosis-related pathways in macrophages contributes data for a rational approach in the treatment and/or prevention of periprosthetic osteolysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.328
Threshold uncertainty score0.513

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Orthopaedic Research®Same topicOrthopaedic implants and arthroplastyFrench-language works237,207