Experimental study of the deformation behaviour of compacted metal powders used in a new rapid tooling process
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To examine the feasibility of a newly proposed rapid tooling process based on the backing of a metal shell with metal powders, the compressive deformation behaviour of selected metal powders and metal shells was investigated. It was found that the mechanical properties of the powder material and the mixing ratio of powders of different sizes had a significant effect on the compressive deformation behaviour of the compacted powders. Softer metal powders with the same compressive stress tended to produce greater plastic deformation and formed a block under a stress of 138 MPa. Mixing two or more powders of different sizes could significantly increase the deformation resistance of the compacted powders. Minimum plastic deformation was achieved when the fraction of the coarse powder in a binary powder mixture reached 0.77. Initial loading at a higher stress could minimize or eliminate the plastic deformation in subsequent loading cycles. This feature could be used advantageously in powder packing for the proposed new rapid tooling process. Some elastic properties of the compacted metal powders were also determined from the compression experimental data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".